![]() This was the perfect book to fall asleep listening to. It wasn't so much that it was boring, as that the cadence of the narration is very soothing. The author employs a writing technique in which he makes long lists of things, often the latin names for plants or animals, that might interest the hardcore biologist and botanist enthusiasts, but I found lulled me to sleep, like a lullaby. In fact, I would listen to the same chapter several nights in a row, having not made it to the end of even one chapter before I drifted off to sleep. I would like to say that the book was light and pleasant, as he describes at length the natural spaces that he is so drawn to--and there is something compelling about how much he loves these spaces and wants to make sure they are preserved--and yet the racism of 1901 finds its way into a world it has no business being. This is in addition to the complete exclusion of women from the narrative in any meaningful way. All said, I just can't recommend it. Not recommended. Click here to purchase this book and support My 50 Bookish Friends blog project. ![]() I I am not at all sure why decided to read this. Nathanial Hawthorne has to be one of my least favorite authors. I hated The Scarlet Letter in high school. But for some reason I thought a Gothic romance horror novel was a great idea, just because it was free. It was not. The next time that I decide to read a classic, I am going to think twice. Not recommended. ![]() I am not sure how I ended up with a second Nepoleonic naval war novel on my list this year. Christian and Scott must have been on the same wavelength to some extent. Having slogged my way through this one just a month or so after Mr. Midshipment Hornblower, I can't say that I am any better off for having read so much about sailing and ship culture circa 1800. Barely a mention of any women characters, the politics of command and the interpersonal relationships between the officers and others just didn't resonate for me and as such I would say skip it. Not recommended. ![]() The highlight of this book was the staying power of Sagan's thoughts on war, environmentalism, human nature, and reaching for the stars. But actually, the real highlight was LaVar Burton reading the book! His voice, mixed with the lyrical insights from the author was a powerful mix. I wish that when they updated the book, they had also footnoted updated science to go with it. I am a far cry from knowledgeable on this topic, but I felt like there were undoubtedly theories that have changed since this was written. I felt, even while reading it, that spending time to understand or learn the science might very well mean that I was unlearning things that were correct now that weren't then. But, with that asterisk, I just put aside most of the more technical sections and focused instead on the philosophical passages. From that perspective, and in Jordie's voice, this was well worth the time. Recommend. ![]() It is hard to believe that this novel was written over 200 years ago. I have never been an Austen fan, never understanding the allure of P&P or S&S when I read them years ago. There is no question that the narration and writing here stands the test of time. But, the main character is thoroughly unlikeable, which I gather is the point. Emma is a sociopath, unwilling to ever take responsibility for the disastrous consequences of her gossiping and meddling and no one around her seems willing to hold her accountable or even aware that she is manipulative. She reminded me of too many people I've known, so I didn't particularly enjoy reading about her antics. That said, it is quite impressive that this same exact personality type continues unbated from the Regency Era to now. Not recommended. ![]() A Room of One's Own. I realized the other day that I have never actually read Virginia Woolf's iconic feminist work. I'm not sure reading the whole thing added a lot to the title sequence, but it wasn't poorly written and the core theme is as relevant now as it was 1929. What I really wish was that there was an audio recording of the 1928 lecture that the book was based on! But, the idea that in order to write anything, people need money to survive on and a quiet place they can focus their thoughts with minimal distraction rings true. Writing is a luxury and those with luxury get to write. This, and not necessarily quality of writer or content, controls whose voices we read. In the wake of Toni Morrison's death, this feels poignant. Toni Morrison, while raising children and working a full time job, got up at 4 a.m. every morning for years to write in the quiet space before the kids woke up. An income and a room of her own, not in the way Woolf envisioned, but it makes her point. The book is short and succinct, which is good since it doesn't say a whole lot more than this in various ways. But serious, I should have gotten around to reading this decades ago. Highly recommend. ![]() Song of Solomon: Toni Morrison is one of my favorite authors, with many books that fundamentally changed how I view the world when I was a teen. Being in a reading rut this year, which seems to have been going on for ages, I thought I would go back to an author I thought was a reliable love for me. Alas, in a continuation of my year of mediocre and crappy reads, I was tremendously disappointed in this book. Written from a man's perspective, the themes of incest and intergenerational dysfunction didn't have the usual tone of depth that I have come to expect from her. I found the description of much of the abuse to be hollow and didn't further the story The characters were hard to relate to and the character development felt hollow. Skip this one. ![]() The Return of the Native (Sandra): So, my recommend streak has been sadly broken by this English novel about "love" and backstabbing, unfaithful, unhappy lovers & spouses who make bad choice after bad choice for self-serving purposes and then appear surprised when things don't go well for them. In typical turn of the (20th) century English fashion, the prose is fabulous. The Audible version has Severus Snape narrating. I loved listening to his voice and the language. I just cannot get behind a story where there are no characters that I like or are rooting for. Recommended by Sandra. *** Comments: Sandra: I'm glad you at least enjoyed his narration, even if not the story. The prose and Alan Rickman make the story for me, but it is representative of a style of literature that I normally do not enjoy reading. ![]() Wild Seed (Cee). I hate to jinx a good streak, but this is the third really good book in a row I've read. As a general rule, I love Octavia Butler, but not everything she's written has resonated with me and some of the books I have really not enjoyed at all (i.e. Kindred, which I know is hailed as brilliant, but you can't account for taste). So, I didn't go into this book with an expectation one way or the other. Turns out, though, that I really liked. It felt like a smarter, stronger progenitor of Underground Railroad (which I also did not enjoy. Sorry, Oprah.). The story held together and the interpersonal relationships were complex and dynamic. It didn't feel forced or like the symbolism was crashing down on your face page after page, but rather that it was a subtle undercurrent you could feel and appreciate without being swept away by it. Recommend. ![]() Slaughter House 5. I try to read the books that are assigned to my kids as reading for school, which is why I diverted from my 50 books recommended by 50 friends in 2018 list to read this one. I hadn't read it before. It is a war novel that was gory and gruesome in its detail about the horrors of war and the misery of coming home from war, with an underlying theme about the misery of serious mental illness. Definitely not my favorite. |
AuthorI'll read anything a friend recommends & I love telling people what I think about it. Every year, I read 50 books recommended by 50 different friends. Welcome to My 50 Bookish Friends Blog. SearchCategories
All
|